HOME |
From the London Gazette, Bryan v. O'Neill, 1841 |
|
|
The significance (and outcome) of the legal proceedings described below is not yet known, but the notices at least provide fairly accurate dates of death for both James & Sarah Mills. The two parties in the proceedings are presumed to be two of their daughters — Emily, wife of Edward Bryan, and Hannah, wife of James Augustus O'Neill. |
|
London Gazette, Issue 19985, 4
June 1841, page 1448 |
|
PURSUANT to a Decree of the High Court of Chan- cery, made in a cause Bryan against O'Neill, the creditors of James Mills, late of Drury-lane, in the county of Middlesex, Chandler (who died in October 1826), and of Sarah Mills, late of the same place, widow of the said James Mills (who died in or about the month of January 1839), are forthwith, by their respective Solicitors, to come in and prove their debts before William Wingfield, Esq. one of the Masters of the said Court, at his chambers, in South- ampton-buildings, Chancery-lane, London, or in default thereof they will be excluded the benefit of the said Decree. |
|
|
|
London Gazette, Issue 19986, 8
June 1841, page 1478 |
|
PURSUANT to a Decree of the High Court of Chan- cery, made in a cause Bryan v. O'Neill, the next of kin of James Mills, late of Drury-lane, in the county of Mid- dlesex, Chandler, who were living at the time of his death (which happened in or about the month of October 1826), or the legal personal representatives of such of them as have since died, are forthwith, by their Solicitors, to come in before William Wingfield, Esq. one of the Masters of the said Court, at his chambers, in Southampton-buildings, Chancery-lane, London, and prove their kindred or repre- sentation, or in default thereof they will be excluded the benefit of the said Decree. |
|
|
|
London Gazette, Issue 19987,
11 June 1841, page 1521 |
|
PURSUANT to a Decree of the High Court of Chan- cery, made in a cause Bryan against O'Neill, the creditors of James Mills, late of Drury-lane, in the county of Middlesex, Chandler (who died in October 1826), and of Sarah Mills, late of the same place, widow of the said James Mills (who died in or about the month of January 1839), are, on or before the 12th day of July 1841, by their Solicitors, to come in and prove their debts before William Wingfield, Esq. one of the Masters of the said Court, at his chambers, in Southampton-buildings, Chancery-lane, Lon- don, or in default thereof they will be peremptorily ex- cluded the benefit of the said Decree. |
|
|
|
London Gazette, Issue 20047,
30 November 1841, page 3121 |
|
PURSUANT to a Decree of the High Court of Chan- cery, made in a cause Bryan v. O’Neill, the next of kin of James Mills, late of Drury-lane, in the county of Mid- dlesex, Chandler, who were living at the time of his death (which happened in or about the month of October 1826), or the legal personal representatives of such of them as have since died, are, on or, before the 10th day of January 1842, by their Solicitors, to come in before William Wingfield, Esq. one of the Masters of the said Court, at his chambers, in Southampton-buildings, Chancery-lane, London, and prove their kindred or representation, or in default thereof they will be peremptorily excluded the benefit of the said Decree. |
|
|
|
Items discovered and transcribed from the London Gazette online at www.gazettes-online.co.uk/ by Natalie Witt
Other miscellaneous transcripts
Page last updated: 16th March 2017, e-mail: martin@hagger.org